ArticleScientific reports2026
Course assessment model in vocational education based on BPNN optimized by genetic algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the current educational system reform, vocational education has become an increasingly popular learning path for Chinese students, making the optimization of course assessment models a critical issue. However, traditional evaluation systems face problems such as subjective judgment and reliance on large amounts of training data, resulting in high labor and time costs. To address these issues, this study proposes a vocational education assessment model based on a Genetic Algorithm combined with a Backpropagation Neural Network. The model processes data using normalization techniques and employs the entropy method to determine the weights of evaluation indicators. Additionally, the Genetic Algorithm is used to optimize the model’s weights and thresholds, while the Levenberg-Marquardt method is applied for data training. The experimental results show that the Root Mean Squared Error decreased from 12.2% in the training phase to 7.8% in the testing phase. After 100 iterations, the model’s loss value dropped to 0.13, and the recall rate increased from 65 to 90%. The precision of the assessment results also improved from 87.9% in the training set to 96.5% in the validation set. For the self-built validation dataset, the model’s Coefficient of Determination stabilized at 0.96 after 100 iterations, and the relative error decreased from 17.1 to 14.9%. The fitting coefficient between the predicted and actual assessment values was 0.998, with an average error of 0.67%, outperforming the comparison model. These results demonstrate that the proposed model can handle various vocational education assessment scenarios with high accuracy, providing innovative ideas for the development of vocational education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.