ArticleScientific reports2026
Admission blood pressure and mortality in acute aortic dissection: Southwest China multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combined effect of admission systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on short- and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains insufficiently characterized. This retrospective cohort study investigated these associations to identify potential blood pressure thresholds linked to minimized mortality risk. We utilized restricted cubic splines (RCS) to characterize nonlinear associations, identifying specific BP levels (nadirs) associated with the lowest risk of mortality. Segmented analysis was employed to assess linear relationships flanking these nadirs, and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the impact of different BP ranges after adjusting for potential confounders. Our results revealed a significant J-shaped correlation for admission SBP and DBP regarding long-term mortality. Mortality risks escalated at SBP levels departing from a nadir of 143.4 mmHg and at DBP departing from 83.7 mmHg. Specifically, an admission SBP/DBP range of 130–160/80–88 mmHg was associated with the lowest long-term all-cause mortality risk, serving as the risk-nadir interval in this cohort. Other independent predictors of mortality included advanced age, myocardial infarction, higher heart rate, history of heart bypass, elevated NT-proBNP and hsTNT, while type B AAD, normal heart rhythm and surgery within 24 h were protective factors. In conclusion, admission SBP and DBP exhibit significant nonlinear associations (J-shaped) with long-term all-cause mortality in AAD. The identified 130–160/80–88 mmHg range represents a potential reference interval for admission hemodynamic management, while acknowledging the need for validation in diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.