ArticleScientific reports2026
RAG-based architectures for drug side effect retrieval using compact LLMs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug side effects are a major public health concern, yet off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs) struggle to reliably answer questions about drug side effects due to limited training data and domain gaps. Here, we evaluate two open-book architectures that inject curated knowledge from the Side Effect Resource (SIDER 4.1) into LLM workflows: a text-based retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline and a graph-based variant (GraphRAG) implemented over a Neo4j knowledge graph. On a balanced forward benchmark of 19,520 drug–side-effect pairs, GraphRAG achieved near-perfect accuracy (99.95% for Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct and 99.96% for Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct). On reverse queries (side effect to drug set), it returned the exact drug sets with precision, recall and F1 all equal to 100% at markedly lower latency (~ 0.09 s), compared with a text-RAG baseline (F1 99.18%, 82.63 s). We further show that a compact LLM-based normalization step can robustly correct common misspellings and variants of drug names without modifying downstream logic. Taken together, these results indicate that integrating structured side-effect knowledge with compact LLMs provides a practical path to interactive, evidence-grounded querying of catalogued drug side effect associations in larger language models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.