ArticleScientific reports2026
InFoRM: a unified inverse and forward model for sensorimotor control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensorimotor control models traditionally consist of two types of internal models: inverse models, which compute the motor commands needed to reach a desired movement goal, and forward models, which predict the resulting sensory feedback. These models are usually considered separate entities, but it is unclear whether such separation exists in the nervous system. Additionally, maintaining separate networks may be more computationally expensive. Therefore, we investigated whether these functions could be executed within a single neural circuit: an inverse-forward-recognition model (InFoRM). We implemented InFoRM using neural networks and compared their ability to reproduce cyclic reaching movements with that of control architectures based on classical, separated inverse and forward models. Desired movement trajectories were represented by recorded three-dimensional kinematics, while efferent (muscle activation) and afferent (muscle length and velocity) signals were obtained through inverse dynamics. Our findings show that InFoRM significantly outperforms control architectures across various conditions, while requiring fewer resources. The network is also able to morph to untrained movement directions, generating motor commands and predicted feedback that had not been learned. These findings demonstrate the computational advantages of integrating inverse and forward processes within a single neural network, suggesting that such unified sensorimotor models may be worthwhile to explore further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.