Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803239›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

InFoRM: a unified inverse and forward model for sensorimotor control.

Myriam Lauren de Graaf, Lena Kloock, André Schwarze, Meike Gerlach, Andrea Arensmann, Kim Joris Boström, Ricarda I Schubotz, Heiko Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Myriam Lauren de GraafDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany. mdegraaf@uni-muenster.de.
Lena KloockDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
André SchwarzeDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Meike GerlachDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Andrea ArensmannDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Kim Joris BoströmDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Ricarda I SchubotzOtto Creutzfeldt Centre for Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience, University of Münster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Heiko WagnerDepartment of Movement Science, University of Münster, Horstmarer Landweg 62b, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor control models traditionally consist of two types of internal models: inverse models, which compute the motor commands needed to reach a desired movement goal, and forward models, which predict the resulting sensory feedback. These models are usually considered separate entities, but it is unclear whether such separation exists in the nervous system. Additionally, maintaining separate networks may be more computationally expensive. Therefore, we investigated whether these functions could be executed within a single neural circuit: an inverse-forward-recognition model (InFoRM). We implemented InFoRM using neural networks and compared their ability to reproduce cyclic reaching movements with that of control architectures based on classical, separated inverse and forward models. Desired movement trajectories were represented by recorded three-dimensional kinematics, while efferent (muscle activation) and afferent (muscle length and velocity) signals were obtained through inverse dynamics. Our findings show that InFoRM significantly outperforms control architectures across various conditions, while requiring fewer resources. The network is also able to morph to untrained movement directions, generating motor commands and predicted feedback that had not been learned. These findings demonstrate the computational advantages of integrating inverse and forward processes within a single neural network, suggesting that such unified sensorimotor models may be worthwhile to explore further.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMovementForward modelInternal modelsInverse modelMotor controlNeural networksReservoir computing

Identifiers

PMID41803239
PMCPMC12972123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.