Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803238›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cross-language hotel review sentiment analysis via multi-agent federated learning with heterogeneous graph attention networks.

Xiaofei Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiaofei HanCollege of Hotel Management, Qingdao Vocational and Technical College of Hotel Management, Qingdao, 266100, Shandong, China. hanxiao202411@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated framework for cross-language hotel review sentiment analysis that combines multi-agent federated learning with heterogeneous graph attention networks to address privacy preservation and multilingual data processing challenges in hospitality reputation management. Our system enables collaborative model training across distributed review platforms while maintaining data locality requirements and achieving improved cross-language sentiment classification performance. Beyond sentiment analysis, we developed dynamic reputation management and fake review detection capabilities that enable proactive intervention strategies for hospitality businesses. The heterogeneous graph architecture captures complex relationships between multilingual textual content, user behaviors, temporal patterns, and service attributes through specialized attention mechanisms. Experimental evaluation on a comprehensive multilingual dataset of 154,680 reviews across four languages demonstrates 89.7 ± 0.007 accuracy in sentiment classification with 0.925 privacy preservation score (Table 6), representing 2.6% point improvement over the strongest baseline XLM-RoBERTa large (87.1 ± 0.008 accuracy, paired t-test p = 0.002). The dynamic reputation management component provides real-time monitoring capabilities with early warning detection, achieving 93.4 ± 0.012 fake review identification accuracy and 66.2% reduction in response time compared to traditional centralized approaches (Table 9). The system offers practical applications for hospitality businesses seeking proactive reputation management while ensuring compliance with international data privacy regulations including GDPR and CCPA.

Indexed as

Cross-language sentiment analysisFederated learningGraph attention networksMultilingual processingPrivacy preservationReputation management

Identifiers

PMID41803238
PMCPMC13086912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.