Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803232›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparison of cancer-specific survival between total thyroidectomy and lobectomy in tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Yubo Sun, Yuxin Jia, Hao Zhang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yubo Sun *Department of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China.
Yuxin Jia *Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China. haozhang@cmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (TCV-PTC) is an aggressive subtype with a poorer prognosis. Controversy persists regarding the surgical strategy for TCV-PTC. Using the SEER database (2005–2017), we analyzed 1,463 patients with pathologically confirmed TCV-PTC who underwent either total thyroidectomy (TT) (n = 1,369) or lobectomy (n = 94). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to address confounding biases. The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS), assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. After PSM (n = 376), TT demonstrated superior CSS compared to lobectomy (p = 0.019). The 5-year and 10-year CSS for TT were 97.8% and 95.0% versus 90.7% and 89.1% for lobectomy in the matched cohort. This survival benefit of TT persisted regardless of radioiodine therapy (RAI) (p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified lobectomy, tumor size > 40 mm, extrathyroidal extension, and lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors for reduced CSS. Total thyroidectomy is associated with improved CSS compared to lobectomy in TCV-PTC, independent of RAI. Greater caution should be considered in selecting lobectomy for TCV patients, especially for patients with tumors > 40 mm, lymph node metastasis, or extrathyroidal extension. Completion thyroidectomy may be beneficial for patients diagnosed with TCV-PTC after lobectomy.

Indexed as

Thyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSEER ProgramCancer-specific survivalPapillary thyroid carcinomaSEER databaseSurgeryTall cell variant

Identifiers

PMID41803232
PMCPMC13096603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.