ArticleScientific reports2026
Non-invasive determination of disease activity in Crohn's disease by serum luminex profiling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and treatment depends on disease activity assessment requiring invasive procedures. We aimed to identify serum cytokines/chemokines that differ between CD and controls, and by clinical, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity. Serum samples were obtained from 103 CD to 40 non-IBD controls undergoing colonoscopy. Clinical information was obtained by questionnaire and chart review. Disease activity was determined: clinically (Crohn’s Disease Activity Index), endoscopically (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease), and histologically from colonoscopic biopsies. Cytokines/chemokines were measured by Luminex assay and compared by disease activity assessments (control vs. inactive vs. active), with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Correlation between activity indices and versus analytes were performed. Multiple analytes were significantly altered between clinically, endoscopically, and histologically inactive and active CD vs. control. One analyte, CXCL9, was significantly increased in active vs. inactive CD in endoscopic and histologic activity assessments. CXCL9 was the only analyte with a significant correlation to both SES (r = 0.57, q < 0.001) and histologic severity (r = 0.42, q < 0.001). CXCL9 had the highest discriminatory capacity for active vs. inactive disease both endoscopically (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.65–0.87) and histologically (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.88). Cytokine/chemokine profiling differentiated CD vs. controls and by disease activity, with CXCL9 as a potential marker distinguishing activity in endoscopic and histologic assessments. Serum cytokine/chemokine profiling may be a non-invasive strategy to assess disease activity in CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.