ArticleScientific reports2026
Application research of powder forming technology in the preparation of heated tobacco core materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heated tobacco core material, a key component of heated tobacco products (HTPs), functions as the primary carrier for aerosol, nicotine, and flavor compounds. However, conventional papermaking methods impose inherent limitations that compromise the overall quality of these core materials. This study proposes a novel method for producing reconstituted tobacco (RT) using ultrafine powder (UFP) derived from tobacco raw materials. Comparative analysis revealed distinct physical and chemical properties of UFP-based RT compared to traditional paper-based RT. Specifically, the UFP-based material exhibited reduced thickness (from 0.144 mm to 0.113 mm) and lower air permeability (from 84 CU to 15 CU), while showing significant improvements in tensile strength (from 726 N/m to 965 N/m), elongation (from 2.331% to 2.732%), density (from 0.659 g/cm³ to 0.779 g/cm³), thermal conductivity (from 0.0525 W/(m·K) to 0.0739 W/(m·K)), and smoothness (from 3 S to 13 S). The UFP-based substrate also demonstrated enhanced wettability, which improved coating performance during RT manufacturing. Although conventional chemical indicators were similar between the two materials, the UFP-based core contained 21.2% more volatile flavor compounds. Thermal analysis indicated a higher total weight loss (37.89% for UFP-based vs. 30.40% for conventional material) within the temperature range of 224-378 °C, along with a shift in the maximum weight loss rate from 296 °C to 287 °C for the UFP-based material. These findings highlight the superior functionality and aerosol generation potential of the UFP-processed heated tobacco core material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.