Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803201›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning for predicting stem cell efficiency for use in beta cell differentiation.

Franziska J Schöb, Alexander Binder, Valentina Zamarian, Valeria Sordi, Hanne Scholz, Anders Malthe-Sørenssen, Dag Kristian Dysthe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franziska J SchöbThe Njord Centre, Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0313, Oslo, Norway. franscho@uio.no.
Alexander BinderScaDS.AI, University of Leipzig, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
Valentina ZamarianDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Valeria SordiDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Hanne ScholzHybrid Technology Hub COE, Institute of Basic Medical Science, University of Oslo, 0313, Oslo, Norway.
Anders Malthe-SørenssenThe Njord Centre, Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0313, Oslo, Norway.
Dag Kristian DystheThe Njord Centre, Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0313, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 945371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical trial data show curative potential of cell therapy for diabetes, however the cells required are a bottleneck. Cell differentiation exhibits substantial variability, even among clones of stem cells generated from the same patient. Human experts struggle to see the difference between highly- and lowly-efficient cell clones early. We therefore propose an image-based deep learning model to guide the selection of the most efficient clones. We apply different deep learning models to learn the morphological differences between good and bad stem cell clones and classify them based on phase-contrast imaging. To gain insight into the learned features, we use layer-wise relevance propagation, and Fourier-based frequency analysis. Using an EfficientNet-V2-S model, we obtain a novel early prediction for the outcome of the differentiation process from patient-derived stem cells to [Formula: see text] -cells using imaging. Clone level accuracy is 96.7 % at 53 hours after start of differentiation. The analysis of learned features shows that the structure of the cell population is an important predictive feature. This study is a proof-of-concept that deep learning combined with label-free imaging can be highly predictive and guide selection of stem cell clones, thereby reducing cost of [Formula: see text] -cell production.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationDeep LearningInsulin-Secreting CellsStem CellsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansPredictive Learning ModelsCell therapyDeep learningDiabetes mellitusIPSC

Identifiers

PMID41803201
PMCPMC13096659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.