ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning for predicting stem cell efficiency for use in beta cell differentiation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The comparative cell physiology of stem cell-derived and primary human β cells.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Gene Expression at the Pluripotency Stage Predicts Pancreatic Endocrine Differentiation in iPSC Clones.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent clinical trial data show curative potential of cell therapy for diabetes, however the cells required are a bottleneck. Cell differentiation exhibits substantial variability, even among clones of stem cells generated from the same patient. Human experts struggle to see the difference between highly- and lowly-efficient cell clones early. We therefore propose an image-based deep learning model to guide the selection of the most efficient clones. We apply different deep learning models to learn the morphological differences between good and bad stem cell clones and classify them based on phase-contrast imaging. To gain insight into the learned features, we use layer-wise relevance propagation, and Fourier-based frequency analysis. Using an EfficientNet-V2-S model, we obtain a novel early prediction for the outcome of the differentiation process from patient-derived stem cells to [Formula: see text] -cells using imaging. Clone level accuracy is 96.7 % at 53 hours after start of differentiation. The analysis of learned features shows that the structure of the cell population is an important predictive feature. This study is a proof-of-concept that deep learning combined with label-free imaging can be highly predictive and guide selection of stem cell clones, thereby reducing cost of [Formula: see text] -cell production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.