ArticleScientific reports2026
Shared patterns of dysregulated gene expression across squamous cell carcinomas unveil predictors for prognosis and drug sensitivity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite extensive multi-omics studies on squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) across different organs, the shared transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that driving SCC remain unclear. This study systematically identified common and distinct transcriptomic alterations in SCCs, highlighting key genes and pathways with prognostic and therapeutic relevance. By integrating large-scale gene expression data from SCC tumors and adjacent normal tissues, we revealed dysregulated gene expression patterns (DGEPs) and quantified their similarity across SCCs through correlation and regression analyses. Gene co-expression network analysis identified SCC-associated modules and hub genes, whose biological and clinical significance was further explored through subtype analysis and prognostic modeling. Our findings show that SCCs from the head and neck, esophagus, and cervix share highly similar DGEPs and regulatory networks, whereas lung and skin SCCs exhibit more distinct molecular characteristics. Key processes such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition, extracellular matrix remodeling, and immune-related pathways were strongly linked to SCC prognosis. Moreover, a six-gene prognostic signature (COL1A1, MMP1, SERPINE1, KRT6A, IGF2BP3, and SPP1) demonstrated robust predictive power for clinical outcomes and therapy response. These findings provide insights into SCC progression and potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.