Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803125›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Superior resilience to poisoning and amenability to unlearning in quantum machine learning.

Yu-Qin Chen, Shi-Xin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu-Qin ChenGraduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing, China. yqchen@gscaep.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0433-1725
Shi-Xin ZhangInstitute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. shixinzhang@iphy.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0347-9750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reliability of artificial intelligence hinges on the integrity of its training data, a foundation often compromised by noise and corruption. Here, through a comparative study of classical and quantum neural networks on both classical and quantum data, we reveal a fundamental difference in their response to data corruption. We find that classical models exhibit brittle memorization, leading to a failure in generalization. In contrast, quantum models demonstrate superior resilience, underscored by a phase transition-like response to increasing noise, revealing a critical point beyond which the model's performance changes qualitatively. We further introduce a framework of quantum machine unlearning, the process of efficiently forcing a trained model to forget bad influences. We show that classical models form rigid, stubborn memories of erroneous data, while the quantum model is significantly more amenable to efficient forgetting with approximate unlearning methods. Our findings establish that quantum machine learning possesses the dual advantage of intrinsic resilience and efficient adaptability, providing a promising paradigm for the trustworthy and reliable artificial intelligence of the future.

Identifiers

PMID41803125
PMCPMC13102925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.