ArticleNature communications2026
Gene expression dynamics of human and mouse craniofacial development at the single-cell level.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human facial development atlas illuminates enhancer-based control of facial individuality.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Craniofacial development: genetics, signaling pathways, teratogenic mechanisms, and clinal significance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Craniofacial development is a complex process that involves the specification of diverse and transient cell types. However, our understanding of these processes and the cell-types present during human craniofacial developmental remains limited. We address this gap in knowledge through single-nucleus RNA sequencing of human craniofacial development spanning 4 to 8 post-conception weeks. This resource identifies multiple subtypes of mesenchyme, epithelium, and cranial neural crest, among other functionally distinct cell types. Extensive comparisons to single-nucleus gene expression and spatial transcriptomics of comparable mouse developmental stages reveal functional conservation of most cell types and identification of anatomically distinct cell subtypes. We find distinct contributions of cellular subtypes to normal facial morphology and common risk factors for orofacial clefts. Additionally, we find specific ectodermal and epithelial subtypes whose gene expression networks are most significantly affected by rare de novo protein-altering variants from orofacial cleft patients. Together our data provide an extensive resource for understanding human craniofacial development at the cellular level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.