Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803110›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Getting robots back on track by reconstituting control in unexpected situations with online learning.

Maxime Allard, Manon Flageat, Bryan Lim, Antoine Cully

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxime Allard *Adaptive And Intelligent Robotics Lab, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, London, SW7 2BX, United Kingdom. m.allard20@alumni.imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5433-9593
Manon Flageat *Adaptive And Intelligent Robotics Lab, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, London, SW7 2BX, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-2176
Bryan LimAdaptive And Intelligent Robotics Lab, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, London, SW7 2BX, United Kingdom.
Antoine CullyAdaptive And Intelligent Robotics Lab, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, Exhibition Rd, London, SW7 2BX, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-7073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic systems are increasingly common in strictly controlled environments (e.g. warehouses), but they have yet to fully integrate into our everyday lives. Everyday scenarios are a challenge for robot controllers due to disturbances that can be caused by unforeseen conditions (e.g., damage, flat tires, or wind gusts) or unexpected usage. In these cases, operators may lose control of their systems, leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes, such as crashes or failed operations. Our method, "Fast Learning-based Adaptation for Immediate Recovery", uses machine learning to counter loss of control by enhancing existing controllers. It rapidly diagnoses and compensates for unseen perturbations by updating an onboard model every 225 milliseconds. Even in a setting with only onboard compute, we show that operators equipped with our method regain control and operate as effectively as in unperturbed conditions across a wide range of perturbations. Other state-of-the-art methods, such as an optimal control and an adaptive control baseline, were found to be half as effective at recovering from perturbations, while an online Deep Reinforcement Learning baseline proved entirely ineffective. In this work, we demonstrate that our online learning method enhances robotic resilience by mitigating the impact of perturbations on system operability.

Identifiers

PMID41803110
PMCPMC13102915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.