Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41803099›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026

AI-driven feature recognition of SEM profiles in deep reactive ion etching based on physics-constrained variational autoencoder.

Fang Wang, Hao Yu, Yechen Miao, Ke Sun, Yi Sun, Heng Yang, Xinxin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fang WangState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5073-8806
Hao YuState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Yechen MiaoState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Ke SunState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Yi SunState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China. sunyi@mail.sim.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6454-1968
Heng YangState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China. h.yang@mail.sim.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8873-9576
Xinxin LiState Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China. xxli@mail.sim.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) is critical for fabricating high-aspect-ratio structures in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), yet its complex, parameter-dependent process poses significant optimization challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers an efficient optimization solution, but its implementation faces the technical challenge of acquiring large-scale data from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, the standard for evaluating DRIE etching outcomes. Traditional SEM analysis relies on labor-intensive manual methods, incurring 15-20% errors and hindering high-throughput manufacturing. Existing automated methods, such as CNNs and SVMs, falter with 70-80% accuracy in noisy SEM images, failing to capture the dynamic evolution of etched structures. To address these limitations, we propose a physics-constrained variational level set autoencoder (VLSet-AE) for automated SEM sectional-profile analysis. By integrating physical etching constraints and a three-dimensional framework (time, linewidth, etching depth), VLSet-AE achieves precise contour recognition and nine critical dimensions extraction-scallop depth (2.29%), scallop width (peak-to-peak: 2.05%, valley-to-valley: 6.28%), scallop radius (4.69%), profile angle (0.56%), trench depth (5.46%), bow width (4.35%), mid width (2.43%), and bottom width (4.78%)-with an average error of 3.65% an overall model accuracy of 94.3%, significantly outperforming manual annotation and state-of-the-art alternatives. Compared to seven current models (e.g., CNNs, LSTMs, ResNet), VLSet-AE achieves the shortest training time (20 s), fastest inference time (1.2 s), highest recognition accuracy (96%), and competitive memory usage (50 MB) and parameter count (4.0 million). By enabling efficient, large-scale data acquisition for AI-optimized DRIE processes, VLSet-AE empowers scalable, intelligent manufacturing, unlocking the potential for advanced microfabrication technologies. This approach provides a forward-looking framework for AI-driven MEMS process design and manufacturing, delivering innovative solutions for future AI-assisted microfabrication advancements.

Indexed as

AI for micro-fabricationDeep reactive ion etchingPattern recognitionPhysics-informed neural networksScanning electron microscopy image recognitionVariational autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID41803099
PMCPMC12972185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.