ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2026
Intraoperative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Traditional Intraoperative Ultrasound for Detecting Lung Nodules During Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesIntraoperative ultrasound (Io-US) is used during thoracoscopy to detect lung lesions, but it remains underused during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), probably due to the difficulty interpreting US findings. We evaluated whether the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could improve the diagnostic accuracy of traditional Io-CEUS for detecting lung nodules during RATS. MATERIAL AND
methodsIt was a retrospective single-centre study including all consecutive patients undergoing RATS for management of small, deeply located lung nodules. In all cases, Io-CEUS was used when Io-US failed to detect lung lesion. The diagnostic accuracy of 2 methods to detect lesions and the inter-group differences regarding operative and perioperative outcomes were statistically evaluated.
resultsOur study population included 33 patients. Io-US correctly detected 15 out of 33 lesions (45%) but missed 18 lesions with isoechoic patterns that were corrected identified by Io-CEUS with a significant improvement of diagnostic accuracy (difference 55%; 95% confidence interval: 37.56- 71.53; P < .0001). The Io-US group (n = 15) compared to the Io-CEUS group (n = 18) showed no significant differences regarding nodule characteristics such as size (8 mm [7-9] vs 7.8 mm [6-9], P = .78); distance from pleura (32 mm [20-44] vs 21 mm [20-42]; P = .69); lobe location (lower lobe: 66% vs 61%, P = .74); and histological diagnosis (primary lung cancer: 100% vs 88%, P = .18).
conclusionsIo-CEUS is an additional tool for thoracic surgeons to detect lung lesions and could be useful, especially in cases of isoechoic lesions that were poorly defined by traditional Io-US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.