Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802991›Full record

ArticleNorth Carolina medical journal2025

Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Insertion Practices Before and After Implementation of Practice Changes Including Telehealth Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic in North Carolina.

Gretchen S Sauer, Mary D Carmody, Lindsey Yates, Johanna Crump, Genevieve Neal-Perry, Kavita S Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North Carolina medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gretchen S SauerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Mary D CarmodyCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lindsey YatesDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Johanna CrumpDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Genevieve Neal-PerryDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kavita S AroraDepartment Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to characterize changes in single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) placement before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in North Carolina.

methodsWe utilized an interrupted time series analysis to characterize single-visit LARC placement after the start of the pandemic across a state-wide health care system.

resultsWithin our cohort of 4591 patients receiving a LARC, 70.36% received single-visit LARC before and 66.98% after the start of the pandemic (odds ratio [OR] = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 - 0.97). There was a slight monthly decrease in the likelihood of single-visit LARC after the pandemic started (0.001, 95% CI: -0.004 - 0.005). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the electronic health record data-based abstraction of variables, as well as the inability to assess patient preferences in visit scheduling.

conclusionsRapid increases in telehealth were associated with slight decreases in single-visit LARC placement. Further study is needed to better understand patient goals and experiences, as well as clinical and public health impacts surrounding the use of telehealth for contraceptive care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Long-Acting Reversible ContraceptionTelemedicineAdultFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisNorth CarolinaSARS-CoV-2Young Adultcontraceptive careCOVID-19health policyLARClong-acting reversible contraceptionmedical journalNorth Carolinaoriginal researchstate-wide healthcaretelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41802991
PMCPMC13368222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.