Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802938›Full record

ArticleNorth Carolina medical journal2025

How Providers, Health System Leaders, and States Can Work Together to Align Disparate Policy Efforts to Address Health-Related Social Needs: Learning from North Carolina.

Brianna Van Stekelenburg, Katie Huber, Yolande Pokam Tchuisseu, Rebecca Whitaker, Raman Nohria, Andrea Thoumi, Michelle Lyn, Robert Saunders, Will Bleser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North Carolina medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brianna Van StekelenburgDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Katie HuberDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Yolande Pokam TchuisseuDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Washington, D.C.
Rebecca WhitakerDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Raman NohriaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Andrea ThoumiDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Michelle LynDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Robert SaundersDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Washington, D.C.
Will BleserDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Duke University, Washington, D.C.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnder the Biden Administration, policy authorities and programs working to address health-related social needs (HRSNs) expanded across the United States. Despite major investments and initiatives to address HRSNs, they are still largely disparate from one another.

methodsWe conducted qualitative research to study North Carolinas HRSN landscape from 2020 to 2023, drawing on interviews with 22 individuals from 10 local HRSN initiatives and previous research collected on the service provision of North Carolinas Medicaid waiver demonstration pilot program to address HRSNs.

resultsFor all states, payers, health systems, and providers, North Carolina demonstrates the archetypes of major policy authorities and programs that can and are being used to address HRSNs. However, we identify challenges that cut across them, including sustainability, operational barriers, and silos between sectors, and we draw implications for providers, health system leaders, and state policymakers looking to expand and align disparate health policy efforts to address HRSNs. LIMITATIONS: We acknowledge several limitations. First, participants in our qualitative research study did not represent all HRSN initiatives in North Carolina; however, we made significant efforts to capture diverse perspectives and major initiatives in the state. Second, we examined one states approach to addressing HRSNs, which has lessons for other states; therefore, the generalizability of our findings depends on other states contexts.

conclusionsAs many states are currently prioritizing a whole-person approach to care for their residents, learning from North Carolina is critical to building a more effective and financially sustainable approach to address HRSNs.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth PolicyHumansMedicaidNorth CarolinaQualitative ResearchUnited Stateshealth carehealthcare policyhealthcare providershealth-related social needshealth systemsHRSNsMedicaid waiver demonstration pilot programNorth Carolinaoriginal researchpolicy makers

Identifiers

PMID41802938
PMCPMC13368130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.