ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
Early Identification of Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated With Rofecoxib Using Real-World Data From the UK: A Nested Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of an AI-Assisted Framework for Systematic Bias Assessment in Observational Studies.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional pharmacovigilance systems have limitations in detecting common adverse drug reactions. We investigated whether real-world data (RWD) could have detected rofecoxib's cardiovascular adverse effects earlier using nested case-control (NCC) and case-crossover (CCO) designs.
methodsWe included adult rofecoxib users from the UK CPRD GOLD (1999-2004). In NCC design, cases of a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) were matched with four controls on age, sex, practice and calendar time. Rofecoxib exposure was categorised as current (≤ 3 months), recent (3-6), or past use (> 6) in NCC, and assessed at the start of each 3-month interval in CCO design. Exposure odds in CCO were compared between a 3-month risk with four reference windows. Conditional logistic regression models estimated adjusted intensity ratio (aIR). To identify the shortest time necessary to detect the association, analyses were conducted in 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-years after the drug's market uptake.
resultsThree thousand two hundred and eighteen cases were matched to 10 745 controls (mean age 73.8 years, 66% female). In NCC, current rofecoxib use (42% of cases) was associated with an 18% higher risk of MACE (aIR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.29) versus past use. The CCO (3210 risk and 12 737 reference windows) showed an 83% increased risk of MACE (aIR 1.83, 95% CI 1.53-2.18). First signal emerged after 2 years with CCO (aIR 3.94, 95% CI 1.88-8.25), and after 3 years with NCC design (aIR 1.46, 95% CI 1.18-1.81).
conclusionUsing RWD, cardiovascular adverse effects of rofecoxib could have been detected within 2 years of the market entry in the UK, well before traditional pharmacovigilance methods. This supports incorporating RWD analysis into routine drug safety monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.