ArticlePediatric dermatology
Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools: Evaluating Ways to Automate Your SALT (GATEWAYS) Scoring of Alopecia Areata.
Article in Pediatric dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease affecting hair follicles that results in nonscarring hair loss. AA impacts 0.1%-0.2% of the United States population, with pediatric patients accounting for 16.0%-27.7% of all cases. The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT), a method of quantifying scalp alopecia, helps guide clinical practice and determine response to therapies in clinical trials. Given the emerging role of image-based assessments of alopecia and growth of multimodal generative artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology, we aimed to assess the "off-the-shelf" ability of a large-language model, GPT-4o, to automate the generation of image-based SALT scores.
methodsChart review of patients with AA seen at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's Dermatology Clinic was conducted to identify 4-view images of patients' scalps and provider-derived SALT scores. One-hundred-and-four 4-view image sets were de-identified and provided to GPT-4o, which was prompted to generate SALT scores. Concordance between GPT-4o's and providers' scores was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC).
resultsICC and CCC between GPT-4o and in-person provider assessments were 0.815 and 0.866. ICC and CCC between GPT-4o and image-based provider assessments were 0.833 and 0.817. ICC and CCC between two providers were 0.950 and 0.948. These high levels of concordance were confirmed on Bland-Altman plots.
conclusionsSALT scoring for AA can be challenging due to provider subjectivity, changing sphericity and growth of patients' scalps, particularly among pediatric patients. Our data show the potential adjunct role that "off-the-shelf" generative AI tools may play in SALT scoring without any prior additional explicit training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.