ArticleDevelopmental biology2026
Genes for 5'mRNA cap binding proteins, eif4ea and eif4eb, have alternative roles during heart regeneration.
Article in Developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
All eukaryotes possess the essential mRNA cap-binding protein eIF4E, which initiates translation. This protein is highly conserved, with versions from zebrafish and humans able to rescue yeast. All fish also have an ancestral eIF4E family, called eif4e1c, which is crucial for heart regeneration. Deletion of eif4e1c leads to growth defects and impaired heart regeneration, but it's unclear if similar effects occur when canonical translation mechanisms are disrupted. In this study, we deleted the two zebrafish paralogs of canonical eIF4E, eif4ea and eif4eb. While individual deletions of these genes do not show the same phenotypes as eif4e1c deletion, compound mutants enhanced eif4e1c phenotypes, suggesting partial compensation by canonical eIF4E proteins in eif4e1c mutants. Surprisingly, unlike other eukaryotes, deleting both canonical mRNA cap-binding proteins did not result in lethality, and eif4e1c could fully compensate for eIF4E function. Although we anticipated that double mutants would regenerate hearts better since they contain eif4e1c alone, no improvement was observed in the double mutant. Interestingly, single deletions of eif4ea or eif4eb did improve heart regeneration. This supports a model where the balance between the eif4e1c and canonical pathways is crucial for stimulating heart regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.