ArticleBiological psychology2026
Determinants and outcomes of pubertal stress recalibration process: A scoping review.
Article in Biological psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants and outcomes of pubertal stress recalibration process: A scoping review.Biological psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early life stress is linked to altered stress system functioning, including hypo- or hyper- autonomic nervous system (ANS) and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity, which contributes to the development of psychopathology. One potential theoretical framework that can guide intervention development is the pubertal stress recalibration hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that puberty, a period of significant biological change, provides an opportunity for stress systems to resample the environment and adjust or recalibrate based on current conditions, representing a potential window for intervention. Given the mediating role of altered stress physiology in connecting ACEs and health outcomes, modifying or recalibrating stress systems may be a promising intervention target. However, there is limited evidence on how these principles can be applied in practice to inform interventions. To address this gap, the current study conducted a scoping review, identifying three animal studies and thirteen human studies. These studies were examined with attention to definitions of stress recalibration, key predictors and outcomes, and areas needing further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.