Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802538›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2026

Results of the American Venous Forum research retreat on C2 disease confirms that the biology of varicose veins including etiology, progression, and novel therapeutics, as well as disparities, are top research priorities.

Ulka Sachdev-Ost, Andrea Obi, Eri Fukaya, Cassius Ochoa Chaar, Scott Robinson, Limael Rodriquez, Khan Nguyen, Peter Henke, Andre Van Rij, Benjamin Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. From scientific inquiry to identifying critical research topics in varicose veins pathophysiology.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ulka Sachdev-OstUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, FL. Electronic address: us22@usf.edu.
Andrea ObiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Eri FukayaStanford University, Stanford, CA.
Cassius Ochoa ChaarYale University, New Haven, CT.
Scott RobinsonUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Limael RodriquezTexas Vascular and Imaging, Houston, TX.
Khan NguyenOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Peter HenkeUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Andre Van RijUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Benjamin JacobsUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFunding for research in varicose vein disease has traditionally been poor, despite its negative impact and high prevalence, affecting millions of people. To identify high-yield topics that would benefit from dedicated research and funding, the American Venous Forum (AVF) Research Committee hosted a Research Priorities Retreat for C2 disease. We hypothesized that an open forum of brief presentations, open panel discussions, and forced rank surveys would identify scientific priorities in C2 disease and provide a foundation for designing future research efforts.

methodsThe initial list of topics for discussion and potential speakers was reviewed by members of the 2024 AVF Research Committee based on recently published guidelines on C2 disease and on scientific experience. All participants were required to participate synchronously during the virtual event. The format prioritized high-yield topics, opportunities for robust discussion, and transparency for registered AVF members. A force rank survey was administered before and after the retreat to committee members, panel speakers, and discussions. In addition, registrants who attended were also given the opportunity to rank topics after discussion.

resultsThe speakers, discussants, and committee members (n = 12) who ranked topics immediately before and after the retreat represented a multidisciplinary team from vascular surgery, interventional radiology, vascular medicine, and phlebology, with clinical and scientific doctorate experience. Understanding the underlying etiologies and the biological mechanisms and identifying new medical therapies were considered the highest research priorities, followed by ways to achieve health care equity for patients with C2 disease.

conclusionsThis study represents a multidisciplinary effort by the AVF Research Committee to identify research priorities in C2 disease. The retreat was carefully planned and transparently executed, providing a mechanism to inform future research efforts of the AVF. Future biologic therapies to target and improve the treatment of varicose veins and health care equity were the top priorities in post event ranking. The resulting document may provide guidance for investigators hoping to pursue research in C2 varicose vein disease.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealthcare DisparitiesVaricose VeinsDisease ProgressionHumansUnited StatesAmerican Venous Forum Research CommitteeResearch prioritiesVaricose veins

Identifiers

PMID41802538
PMCPMC13138142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.