SynthesisClinical child psychology and psychiatry2026
Reference Values of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits in Youth Populations: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Callous-unemotional (CU) traits are directly related to psychopathic traits, as they are based on features such as emotional insensitivity, lack of empathy, and lack of remorse. These traits typically develop during childhood and adolescence. Identifying them is extremely important, as they are predictors of antisocial behavior and the potential development of psychopathic traits in adulthood. The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) has been widely used to measure callous-unemotional traits in children and adolescents. A systematic literature review was conducted to establish reference values for the ICU in these age groups. Using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant studies were identified through databases and manual searches. The review included articles with empirical and quantitative methodologies. A total of 297 studies were included. Across regions, ICU scores were consistently higher in clinical, Disruptive Behavior Disorder-diagnosed, and forensic samples than in community samples, supporting the role of CU traits as markers of elevated psychopathological risk. Subscale analyses showed that Callousness and Uncaring more reliably differentiated high-risk groups than the Unemotional subscale. Substantial regional variation was observed, with particularly elevated community scores in Asian samples and broadly comparable forensic scores across Western regions. ICU scores vary systematically by sample type, region, and subscale, underscoring the importance of context-sensitive interpretation. The pooled reference values provided in this review offer an empirical framework for comparative and clinical interpretation of ICU scores in the absence of standardized norms or cutoffs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.