Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802176›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2026

Oral preexposure prophylaxis use and the risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections and HIV among African women: A prospective observational cohort study.

David Mukasa, John Kinuthia, Allison Meisner, Daniel Matemo, Torin Schaafsma, Jennifer Morton, Cynthia Wandera, Elvira Budiawan, Valarie Kemuto, Cherotich Irine and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04666792 (PrEParing Family Planning Clinics to Streamline Integration of HIV Prevention Services for Young Women in Kenya), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04666792 phase4completednot on this map

PrEParing Family Planning Clinics to Streamline Integration of HIV Prevention Services for Young Women in Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2021 to 2024Enrolled25,457ConditionsHIV Infections, Contraception, STIArmsPrEP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

David MukasaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-2715
John KinuthiaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
Allison MeisnerVaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, United States of America.
Daniel MatemoResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Torin SchaafsmaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.
Jennifer MortonDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-6254
Cynthia WanderaResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elvira BudiawanDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8599-431X
Valarie KemutoResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cherotich IrineResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stephen OdhiamboResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mercy BiiResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Beatrice OduorResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Esther AchiengResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Tessy OyombraResearch & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ugochinyere Vivian UkahDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Kenneth K MugwanyaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-7468
FP Plus Project Team

Funding

Integrating PrEP delivery in family planning clinics in KenyaR01MH123267 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUGWANYA, KENNETH KIGGUNDU · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
A differentiated care model to improve the efficiency of PrEP delivery in KenyaR00MH118134 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUGWANYA, KENNETH KIGGUNDU · 2019 to 2021
$743k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH118134NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively reduces HIV incidence when used with sufficient adherence, but does not protect against bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Several studies have documented high rates of bacterial STIs among individuals initiating and using PrEP. We evaluated the association between PrEP use and the risk of STI among African women accessing family planning clinics. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a prospective cohort study nested within a large pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of PrEP delivery in Kenyan family planning clinics, with participant enrollment from June 18, 2021, to May 18, 2023, and follow-up through February 02, 2024 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04666792). The study population included sexually active HIV-negative women aged ≥15 years at elevated HIV risk per Kenyan PrEP guidelines. Participants were offered standard-of-care oral PrEP with the option to decline and followed quarterly for 12 months with assessments of HIV status, sexual behavior, and PrEP use. Urine samples were batch tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis using the GeneXpert CT/NG real-time polymerase chain reaction nucleic acid amplification test assay. The primary exposure was self-reported PrEP initiation and PrEP use consistency through 6 months, categorized as never used PrEP, inconsistently on PrEP, or consistently on PrEP. Multivariable modified Poisson generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with robust standard errors were used to estimate associations between PrEP use and incident STI; clinic-level intracluster correlation coefficients were negligible. The secondary outcomes were incident HIV infection and sexual behaviors, which included condomless sex at last sex, sex with any new partners in the past 3 months, and multiple sex partners. HIV testing was performed at each scheduled visit, at enrollment, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following the Kenya national HIV testing algorithm, using Determine HIV-1/2 and Fast Response test kits. All models for the primary outcome were adjusted for baseline covariates determined apriori as potential confounders, which included age, STI diagnosis at enrollment, any contraceptive use, number of sexual partners (categorized as any more than one sexual partner), education status, marital status, last partner HIV status, any transactional sex in 3 months pre-enrollment, and clinic site. Among 650 women enrolled, 60.0% (389) initiated PrEP at baseline and 14.6% (38/261) initiated post-enrollment. Median age was 26 years (IQR 23-30), 40% (262/650) were aged ≤24 years, and 67% (436/648) did not know their primary partner's HIV status. At baseline, 11% (74/650) had an STI, including 9.9% (23/232) of consistent PrEP users, 9.2% (13/141) of inconsistent users, and 14.0% (38/277) of women who declined PrEP. During follow-up, 19.1% (114/597) had at least one STI diagnosis, with similar risk among women who initiated PrEP at baseline compared with those who declined (19.2% [68/354] versus 18.9% [46/244]; aRR 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.61; p = 0.580). Compared with non-PrEP users (12.7% [25/195]), STI risk was 6.0% (12/200) among consistent PrEP users (aRR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27-1.19; p = 0.130) and 16.5% (17/103) among inconsistent users (aRR 1.43, 95% CI 0.73-2.77; p = 0.290). Chlamydia accounted for 87.7% (100/114) of STI diagnoses. STI risk was higher among women aged ≤24 years (aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04-2.07; p = 0.029) and those with a baseline STI (aRR 2.96, 95% CI 2.12-4.14; p < 0.001). Four HIV infections occurred over 594 person-years (incidence 0.67, 95% CI 0.18-1.72 per 100 person-years), including three among women who declined PrEP (incidence 1.25, 95% CI 0.26-3.66 per 100 person-years). The main study limitation was oral PrEP use was assessed based on client self-report and not objectively through drug levels testing.

conclusionsIn this prospective cohort study among African women at elevated risk for HIV, 60% initiated PrEP at baseline and 14.6% (38/261) post-enrollment. PrEP use was not associated with increased risk for STI diagnosis through one year of follow-up. HIV incidence was low overall, consistent with expanded PrEP availability in similar populations.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexually Transmitted Diseases, BacterialAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceKenyaProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41802176
PMCPMC13002101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.