Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802133›Full record

ArticleBlood2026

The prevalence and clinical significance of clonal monocytosis.

William G Dunn, Michael C Sachs, Matteo Maggi, Muxin Gu, Pedro M Quiros, Kiran Batta, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Margarete A Fabre, Timothy Chevassut, Irina Mohorianu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

William G DunnCambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5198
Michael C SachsSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1279-8676
Matteo MaggiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Muxin GuCambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Pedro M QuirosDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7793-6291
Kiran BattaEpigenetics of Haematopoiesis Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3494-0979
Christen Lykkegaard AndersenResearch Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Margarete A FabreDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Timothy ChevassutDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8672-1906
Irina MohorianuCambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4863-761X
Daniel H WisemanCancer Research Division, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0715-1402
George S VassiliouCambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4337-8022

Funding

Blood Cancer UK 7035-24Cancer Research UK CCASF-NOV22/10000Cancer Research UK EDDCPJT\100010Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre CTRQQR-2021\100012Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203151/A/16/ZWellcome Trust (203151/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe terms clonal monocytosis of undetermined significance (CMUS) and clonal cytopenia and monocytosis of undetermined significance (CCMUS) were introduced by the International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms to describe cases of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and concurrent monocytosis that did not meet the diagnostic criteria of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. To date, their practical relevance as clinicopathological entities at a population level has not been assessed. Here, we assess the prevalence, significance, and natural history of CMUS and CCMUS among 431 531 UK Biobank participants through analysis of clinical, genomic, and health outcome data. We find that CMUS with an absolute monocytosis and CCMUS are high-risk entities strongly associated with incident myeloid neoplasia (MN), cardiovascular disease, and renal disease. Noting the overall higher monocyte counts in men and the low rate of progression of DNMT3A-CMUS, we reveal that amending the definition of CMUS/CCMUS to incorporate sex-specific monocyte thresholds and the exclusion of isolated DNMT3A mutations from the definition significantly strengthens the association with incident MN. Finally, given their association with poor outcomes, we develop MoSAIC, a machine-learning classifier, to infer the presence of SRSF2 mutations (associated with high MN risk) among individuals with monocytosis, based on complete blood count indices alone. We corroborate our findings in an independent cohort of 625 328 Danish primary care patients. Our findings underscore the clinical relevance of CMUS and CCMUS as distinct high-risk states within the spectrum of CH and establish an evidence base to refine their diagnostic definition.

Indexed as

MonocytesAgedClonal HematopoiesisCytopeniaFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID41802133
PMCPMC13389862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.