Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802110›Full record

ReviewActa cytologica2026

Evaluation and Recommendations to Modernize Cervical Cancer Detection and Prevention Programs in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities - A Narrative Review.

Toni Ricardo Martins, Steven S Witkin, Rosana Lima de Oliveira, João Guilherme de Souza Gadelha, Jhennyfer Assunção, Iasmin Albuquerque Alves, Emanuelle Cristina de Andrade Valente, Valquíria Alves Martins, Kátia Luz Torres, Allyson Guimarães da Costa and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta cytologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Toni Ricardo MartinsFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil, tr.martins@yahoo.com.br.
Steven S WitkinVirology Laboratory - LIM/52, Medicine Tropical Institute, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosana Lima de OliveiraFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
João Guilherme de Souza GadelhaFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Jhennyfer AssunçãoFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Iasmin Albuquerque AlvesFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Emanuelle Cristina de Andrade ValenteFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Valquíria Alves MartinsPrograma de Pós Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada - PPGIBA - Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Kátia Luz TorresPrograma de Pós Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada - PPGIBA - Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Allyson Guimarães da CostaPrograma de Pós Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada - PPGIBA - Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Adhemar Longatto-FilhoLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
José Eduardo LeviVirology Laboratory - LIM/52, Medicine Tropical Institute, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Cássia Mendes CorreaVirology Laboratory - LIM/52, Medicine Tropical Institute, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Background: Cervical cancer remains a major public health problem particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Systematic screening of at-risk women, detection of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) types, and vaccination against HPV are essential strategies for reducing the incidence and mortality of this malignancy. SUMMARY: This narrative review details publications related to the panorama of cervical cancer in Brazil and highlights major deficiencies as well as advances related to prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease. DISCUSSION: Cervical cytology, specifically the Papanicolaou test, has been the main method of cervical cancer screening in Brazil. The subsequent implementation of HPV testing, alone or combined with cytology, has been shown to have increased efficacy in the detection and elimination of precancerous lesions. Currently, regional inequities in access to cervical cancer screening, prevention, and treatment actions, as well as in expertise in HPV detection protocols, have resulted in large regional differences in the quality of patient care. Vaccination against HPV is available free of charge by the Unified Health System. However, coverage remains suboptimal due to barriers such as misinformation, resistance from legal guardians, and failures in distribution logistics. KEY MESSAGES: State-of-the-art molecular testing and effective screening of at-risk vulnerable populations for cervical lesions and for the presence of HPV still face regional, logistical, and infrastructure barriers. To improve cervical cancer prevention, detection, and treatment in Brazil, it is necessary to provide upgraded vaccination, screening, and treatment strategies, with a focus on an equitable country-wide access to comparable health services. </p>.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBrazilFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMass ScreeningPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus VaccinesVaginal SmearsPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancer screeningCervical cytologyPrevention in low-resource settingsPrimary screeningPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41802110
PMCPMC13068380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.