ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Global biodiversity and the expanding Tree of Life.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Earth's biodiversity: How much is there?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Global biodiversity and the expanding Tree of Life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Two new species ofMycoKeys · 2026Article
- Addition of four new wood-inhabiting fungi ofMycoKeys · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global biodiversity is increasingly threatened, but still poorly known. Preserving higher taxa (e.g., genera, families, orders) is especially important because each higher taxon may represent more genetic, morphological, ecological, and functional diversity than a typical species within a genus. Given this, there has been considerable focus on the loss of clades and their phylogenetic diversity. However, we know little about whether there are also gains of new clades: new higher taxa that are based on newly discovered species. Here, we analyze these newly discovered branches across the Tree of Life. We estimate that >700 new genera, >20 new families, and >3 new orders are described every year, each associated with newly discovered species. The distribution of new genus-level clades largely reflects current species richness patterns among groups. Thus, they are dominated by terrestrial arthropods. At higher taxonomic ranks, the distribution of new clades among groups is increasingly unrelated to the current, known species richness of these groups, and fungi and bacteria predominate. New clades are increasingly microscopic at higher taxonomic ranks and are often marine or host associated. Overall, we suggest that the known Tree of Life is continuing to rapidly expand with many newly discovered clades, not merely contracting with recent extinctions. Discovering and describing these new clades before they disappear should be an urgent research priority. There is also a pressing need to better incorporate phylogenies into the discovery of these new higher taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.