ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
The path to room-temperature superconductivity: A programmatic approach.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Room-temperature superconductivity is arguably the greatest challenge in condensed matter physics, with significant practical and commercial implications if it can be solved. There are no physical laws preventing this from occurring; indeed, superconductivity has been observed in so many different materials under so many different conditions that it is almost a "generic" property of nonmagnetic metals. This guides our viewpoint that high-temperature superconductivity is possible, if difficult to realize. Here, we lay out two grand challenges facing the field, titled the Prediction Challenge and the Engineering Challenge, and put forward a programmatic approach for overcoming them. The Prediction Challenge addresses the fact that our ability to predict new conventional superconductors has dramatically advanced in recent years, but most predicted materials are not experimentally synthesizable. To address this challenge, we propose a shift from modeling the superconducting critical temperature and dynamic stability toward high-throughput ab initio and predictive thermodynamics/synthesis modeling. The Engineering Challenge describes how we can control superconductivity with various "knobs," including pressure, nanostructuring, and light. However, our ability to predict how a specific knob will modify a given superconductor is limited, making it difficult to fully exploit them. We describe the current status and identify areas where additional work is needed to fully exploit six of the most common knobs. Progress in both of these grand challenges, while closely integrating theory and experiment into a continuous feedback loop and incorporating insights from fields beyond physics and materials science, could unlock the underlying keys to room-temperature superconductivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.