Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802063›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

The path to room-temperature superconductivity: A programmatic approach.

Rohit P Prasankumar, Matthew Julian, Michael Hutcheon, Christoph Heil, Liangzi Deng, Dmitri Basov, Ching-Wu Chu, Riccardo Comin, Philip Kim, Bryce Meredig and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rohit P PrasankumarEnterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WA 98007.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-2831
Matthew JulianEnterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WA 98007.
Michael HutcheonEnterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WA 98007.
Christoph HeilInstitute of Theoretical and Computational Physics, Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, Graz 8010, Austria.
Liangzi DengDepartment of Physics, Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-2772
Dmitri BasovDepartment of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Ching-Wu ChuDepartment of Physics, Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204.ORCID 0000-0003-3955-7095
Riccardo CominDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-1069-9973
Philip KimDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0002-8255-0086
Bryce MeredigTravertine Labs, Las Vegas, NV 89103.
Chris PickardDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9684-5432
Warren E PickettDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-4591-7691
Timothy StrobelEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015.
Stuart WolfEnterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WA 98007.
Eva ZurekDepartment of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260.ORCID 0000-0003-0738-867X
Nathan MyhrvoldEnterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WA 98007.ORCID 0000-0003-3994-5143

Funding

Enterprise Science Fund, Intellectual Ventures N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Room-temperature superconductivity is arguably the greatest challenge in condensed matter physics, with significant practical and commercial implications if it can be solved. There are no physical laws preventing this from occurring; indeed, superconductivity has been observed in so many different materials under so many different conditions that it is almost a "generic" property of nonmagnetic metals. This guides our viewpoint that high-temperature superconductivity is possible, if difficult to realize. Here, we lay out two grand challenges facing the field, titled the Prediction Challenge and the Engineering Challenge, and put forward a programmatic approach for overcoming them. The Prediction Challenge addresses the fact that our ability to predict new conventional superconductors has dramatically advanced in recent years, but most predicted materials are not experimentally synthesizable. To address this challenge, we propose a shift from modeling the superconducting critical temperature and dynamic stability toward high-throughput ab initio and predictive thermodynamics/synthesis modeling. The Engineering Challenge describes how we can control superconductivity with various "knobs," including pressure, nanostructuring, and light. However, our ability to predict how a specific knob will modify a given superconductor is limited, making it difficult to fully exploit them. We describe the current status and identify areas where additional work is needed to fully exploit six of the most common knobs. Progress in both of these grand challenges, while closely integrating theory and experiment into a continuous feedback loop and incorporating insights from fields beyond physics and materials science, could unlock the underlying keys to room-temperature superconductivity.

Indexed as

condensed matterquantumsuperconductivity

Identifiers

PMID41802063
PMCPMC12994211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.