Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41802062›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Pareto optimality reveals an atlas of cellular archetypes.

George Crowley, Uri Alon, Stephen R Quake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The exact mathematical form of the Pareto principle.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

George CrowleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Uri AlonDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
Stephen R QuakeDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-1613-0809

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to identify universal organizing principles behind phenotypic variation within cell types. Pareto optimality describes how trade-offs between optimal solutions account for variation, predicting that the boundary points of a data distribution reflect specialized functions. We hypothesized that transcriptomic variation was explained by Pareto optimality across all cell types. We then used the Tabula Sapiens Atlas of single-cell RNA sequencing across cell types and tissues in the human body to test this hypothesis and found that most cell types adhere to this theory. This enabled us to use this principled method to characterize the functions performed by each cell type. These phenotypes are derived from an unbiased approach and do not incorporate ideas from existing biological models or theories, and yet in many cases they recapitulate our understanding of the functions of major cell types. Ultimately, we conclude that multiobjective optimization broadly shapes the observed phenotypic variation within cell types. This finding enables us to write explicit representations of the low-dimensional manifolds on which transcriptomes of single cells reside. This can inform the design of the next generation of virtual cell language models, which aim to statistically learn low-dimensional transcriptomic manifolds.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeHumansModels, BiologicalPhenotypeSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysisbiophysicscell biologycomputational biology

Identifiers

PMID41802062
PMCPMC12993957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.