ArticlePloS one2026
Artificial intelligence-Driven detection and decision support system for precision management of maize downy mildew.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic enhancement of root, tuber and cereal crops via pangenomics, multi-omics integration and AI-driven prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) enables rapid and precise plant disease detection, offering transformative potential for crop protection. Maize downy mildew (MDM), a destructive disease, causes substantial yield losses, making early detection critical. In this study, we evaluated the performance of thirteen machine-learning (ML) and deep-learning (DL) algorithms for classifying healthy and infected maize leaves using a curated field dataset. Model performance was assessed using multiple metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Among the tested models, VGG16 achieved the highest performance, with 97% accuracy, 0.98 precision, 0.95 recall, 0.97 F1-score, and an AUC-ROC of 0.99. Training and validation curves indicated minimal overfitting, demonstrating robust generalization. Feature visualization using t-SNE revealed clear separability between healthy and diseased samples, while Grad-CAM analysis confirmed that VGG16 focused on biologically relevant symptomatic regions, such as chlorotic streaks and leaf discoloration. Confusion matrix analysis further validated near-perfect classification, with very few misclassifications. Furthermore, we developed a web-based application (https://maize-mdm.streamlit.app/) that not only classifies MDM but also provides farm-level advisory measures. Two-year field trials of DSS-guided fungicide applications effectively suppressed MDM, reducing disease severity (PDI 3.20-5.20; PROC 93-96%), increasing grain yield (75.6-80.2 q/ha; PIOC 195-289%), and improving economic returns (B:C ratio 3.36-3.57) compared to untreated controls. Overall, this study demonstrates that AI-driven models, integrated with web-based decision support, provide accurate, interpretable, and actionable solutions for precision management of maize diseases, contributing to improved yield, profitability, and sustainable agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.