Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801961›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

SynthCraft: An AI partner for synthetic data generation to support data access and augmentation in healthcare.

Thomas Callender, Anders Boyd, Robert Davis, Silas Ruhrberg Estevez, Juan M Lavista Ferres, Mihaela van der Schaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas CallenderDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-9433
Anders BoydDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Robert DavisCambridge Centre for AI in Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Silas Ruhrberg EstevezSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Juan M Lavista FerresAI for Good Lab, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America.
Mihaela van der SchaarCambridge Centre for AI in Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to high-quality data provides the foundation for biomedical research. But data access is often limited or challenging due to privacy constraints, whilst the data themselves may be unrepresentative or sparse. Synthetic data can support both privacy-preserving data access and advanced analytical workflows, including data augmentation or the development of digital twins. However, the use of synthetic data remains limited due to the complexity of the methods themselves, their use, and their evaluation. To address this, we developed SynthCraft, an AI tool to support the principled, transparent, application of state-of-the-art synthetic data generation methods. SynthCraft couples a reinforcement learning-based reasoning engine with large language models (LLMs) to orchestrate the workflow necessary for the generation of synthetic data based on dynamic interaction with the user through natural language. We demonstrate the capability of SynthCraft with both tabular and genomic datasets: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using SynthCraft, we analysed the privacy, statistical fidelity, and downstream utility of four different synthetic data generators both with and without explicit privacy-preserving designs when applied to both the NHANES and TCGA datasets. We show that how different generators perform differently - and that no single method was optimal - across varying use-cases and datasets. Furthermore, we demonstrate how SynthCraft can be used for data augmentation as part of a workflow to attempt to mitigate imbalances in the proportion of individuals from different ethnic backgrounds. In conclusion, a human-in-the-loop AI partner using LLMs can support the generation of synthetic datasets. Such tools could improve the quality, reproducibility, and transparency of research methods, whilst increasing their accessibility. Research into their use across different methodological areas is warranted.

Identifiers

PMID41801961
PMCPMC12970901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.