ArticlePloS one2026
Multidimensional Healthy Adult Scale: Development and validation of a measurement tool to understand how the Healthy Adult works in a Turkish population.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthy Adult (HA), a key schema therapy construct, represents the individual's 'healthy' state, characterized by balancing personal and others' needs within a realistic perspective. We developed the Multidimensional Healthy Adult Scale to explore how various dimensions of the HA contribute to different aspects of well-being and tested its factor structure and psychometric properties. Data were collected from 472 participants (24.1% male, 75.5% female) between the ages of 18 and 60. The items of the scale were generated based on a qualitative study conducted in Türkiye. Data were analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling in Lavaan, which demonstrated a strong fit for the measurement and predictive models. The Bond, Balance, and Battle factors, along with the overarching HA, showed good fit. Low Balance scores were associated with higher psychopathology and negative affect, while high Battle scores were associated with greater life satisfaction and positive affect. Although Bond correlated positively with Balance and Battle, high Bond scores, when controlling for the others, were linked to increased psychopathology and negative affect. These results provide evidence for a multidimensional structure of the HA. Further validation of the scale and clarification of Bond's role is needed for clinical insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.