Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801922›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Fine-grained identification of greenhouse crop leaf diseases based on reconstruction-generation network.

Yang Wu, Jie Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yang WuSchool of Intelligent Equipment Engineering, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-8163
Jie LiuSchool of Intelligent Equipment Engineering, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are few data labels in the agricultural field, and accurate annotation of existing data requires professional knowledge and is time-consuming and laborious, especially the images collected in the actual greenhouse scene, which lack accurate annotation by professionals. Fine-grained refers to the highly detailed division or analysis of data or tasks, with a particular emphasis on capturing micro-level differences. In order to improve the accuracy of greenhouse crop disease identification, the crop disease identification problem is regarded as a fine-grained classification problem, and the attention mechanism is introduced into the classification network. The VAE enhancement strategy is introduced into the disease identification network model to improve the accuracy when the annotation is insufficient. Aiming at the problem that the actual environmental background of greenhouse is complex, there are many disturbances, the disease spot area is small, and the difference between leaf disease and wilt and soil is not obvious, a fine-grained identification model of leaf disease based on reconstruction-generation is further proposed. The attention mechanism was used to increase the recognition ability. During training, the VAE strategy was first used to make full use of a large number of labeled and unlabeled data to realize unsupervised learning, and then the labeled data was used for supervised disease identification, and the Reconstruction-Generation Network(RGN) was used to force the classification network to pay more attention to discriminative regions to find differences. Reconstruction-generation belongs to self-supervised learning, which uses the unsupervised information in the data to construct supervised signals, and can generate useful feature representations by learning the structure and pattern in the data. Experimental results show that the classification recognition accuracy of the proposed fine-grained leaf disease identification model based on reconstruction-generation adopts the attention mechanism reached 98.03%. The proposed method is applied to the detection model, the correct recognition rate of diseased leaves was 95.07%, and the correct recognition rate of healthy leaves was 98.46%, which can realize the end-to-end detection and identification of diseased leaves and meet the practical requirements.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant DiseasesPlant Leaves

Identifiers

PMID41801922
PMCPMC12970908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.