ArticlePloS one2026
Patient-derived organoids predict chemotherapy response of locally advanced gastric cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic modeling of phenotypic drug response profiles in patient-derived organoids.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of standard adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) remains suboptimal, particularly in patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). Urgent demand exists for reliable preclinical models to predict therapeutic responses, and in vitro drug sensitivity testing using patient-derived organoids (PDOs) has emerged as a promising platform. In this study, PDOs were established from patients with locally advanced GC and analyzed via next-generation sequencing (NGS) and pharmacotyping. Seventeen GC PDOs were successfully generated, achieving a success rate of 63%. These PDOs closely recapitulated the histopathological and genetic features of their parental tumors. Drug sensitivity tests revealed subtype-specific response patterns: PDOs derived from SRCC were sensitive to epirubicin and paclitaxel but resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin. In contrast, non-SRCC PDOs demonstrated robust sensitivity to paclitaxel, epirubicin, and oxaliplatin. Among all tested drugs, paclitaxel showed the highest tumor-inhibitory efficacy in both subtypes. Furthermore, non-SRCC PDOs were significantly more sensitive to 5-FU and oxaliplatin than SRCC PDOs. Ex vivo pharmacotyping of PDOs accurately predicted clinical therapeutic responses in GC patients, with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 90.9%. Notably, patients whose PDOs were drug-sensitive in vitro had significantly longer disease-free survival than those whose PDOs were drug-resistant (P = 0.044). These findings highlight the potential of GC PDOs as reliable preclinical models that faithfully recapitulate tumor biology and therapeutic responses, thereby providing a valuable tool for predicting individualized treatment outcomes and advancing precision oncology for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.