Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801881›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Top ten research priorities for Essential Emergency and Critical Care: A modified Delphi process.

Ryan Rhys Ellis, Wurry Ayuningtyas, Alexandra Wharton Smith, Martin Gerdin Wärnberg, Carl Otto Schell, EECC Prioritisation Group, Tim Baker

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan Rhys EllisDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care, The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7238-0282
Wurry AyuningtyasDr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Alexandra Wharton SmithDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Martin Gerdin WärnbergDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl Otto SchellDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-1336
EECC Prioritisation Group
Tim BakerDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-7018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical illness leads to millions of preventable deaths each year. Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) is a pragmatic, globally relevant approach designed to address critical gaps in basic life-saving care. This study identified the top ten research priorities to guide the development of EECC over the next five years. At the first global EECC Research Conference in November 2024, 46 clinicians, researchers, and policymakers representing nine predominantly high-income countries participated in a structured priority-setting process. Participants formed four thematic groups focused on the current state, implementation, impact, and refinement of EECC. Throughout five sessions, groups developed sub-themes, generated research questions, and identified key priorities. An anonymous survey was used to rank questions within each theme, followed by a final selection of the top ten. Participants developed 28 research questions across four themes. The final top ten included four on EECC implementation, four on its current state, and two on impact. No top-ranked questions emerged from the refinement theme. The top ten EECC research priorities focused on estimating the burden of critical illness and on implementing programs effectively. Advancing these priorities through collaborative research is essential to strengthen health systems and improve outcomes for critically ill patients globally.

Identifiers

PMID41801881
PMCPMC12970883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.