ArticlePloS one2026
Timed image naming evaluation for adults (TIME) using BOSS images.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normative data for naming photographs are essential in psycholinguistic research. However, image naming norms are typically derived from young adults, limiting their relevance for older populations, who are at greater risk for language impairments due to neurological conditions such as stroke, traumatic brain injury or dementia. Further, lexical retrieval declines also in healthy aging, making it essential to establish norms for older adults to distinguish normal from impaired word retrieval. This study provides normative data for 600 photographs of the Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS) focusing on three age cohorts (40-50, 51-65, and 66+). We examined naming accuracy, name agreement, H values, and response times (RT) to explore age-related differences in image naming. Participants completed a web-based oral picture naming task via video conferencing. Results revealed overall high naming accuracy (mean = 80.5%) and name agreement (mean = 87.4%) across the full sample, with modest variability across the range of adults self-reportedly free of neurological deficits. The 51-65 cohort showed the highest accuracy and fastest RTs. Significant correlations between RT and name agreement and H value support the inclusion of RT as key indices of naming difficulty. We discuss the implications of these findings considering psycholinguistic norms, demographic influences, and methodological differences from previous image norming studies. Novel contributions of this study include normative data for a large sample of middle to older age adults including RT and alternative names, expanding the utility of the BOSS image set for examining aging-related changes in lexical access. The study underscores the importance of including RT measures alongside traditional naming norms for improved characterization of visual stimuli. Open access to the updated dataset aims to facilitate future research into age-related language processing and supports personalized applications in cognitive and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.