ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Tear Clearance Rate Assessment with a Modified Slit Lamp Biomicroscope.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTear clearance rate (TCR) was assessed historically with fluorophotometry and used as a marker of dry eye disease (DED). Since it requires advanced tools and specialised expertise, this method has largely been confined to research settings. This study proposed a clinically accessible method for assessing TCR using a modified slit lamp biomicroscope.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 95 subjects divided into dry eye (n = 65) and age-matched control (n = 30) groups. Five microlitres of 0.5% fluorescein solution was instilled, and tear fluorescence intensity decay was recorded over 5 min post instillation using a smartphone attached to a slit lamp biomicroscope, equipped with narrow-band filters designed to observe fluorescence. Custom-written software was used to quantify fluorescence intensity over time from the entire exposed ocular surface and calculate blinking frequency. TCR was calculated as the percentage drop in image intensity at selected intervals (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 min) post instillation. Additionally, subjects underwent symptom assessment (ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and 5-item dry eye questionnaire (DEQ-5)), tear osmolarity, ocular surface staining, tear meniscus height, bulbar and limbal redness and noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIKBUT) assessment with the Oculus Keratograph 5M.
resultsBiomicroscope-based TCRs were lower in the DED group than controls, with TCR₀.₅₋₂ (percentage decrease in fluorescence intensity between 30 s and 2 min after instillation) showing the strongest discriminatory capacity between these two groups (TCR₀.₅₋₂: 6.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.01). Early-phase TCRs correlated linearly with DED severity, OSDI, DEQ-5 and ocular surface staining (r from -0.21 to -0.43, all p < 0.05) and positively with measures of NIKBUT (r from 0.27 to 0.30, all p < 0.01).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the clinical feasibility of assessing TCR using a modified slit lamp biomicroscope. The method discriminates effectively between non-DED and DED subjects, with strong correlations with established diagnostic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.