Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801619›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026

Retesting reverse-reward performance in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) after 16 years: evidence of aging-related decline.

Yui Sugimoto, James R Anderson, Hika Kuroshima

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yui SugimotoGraduate School of Letters, Department of Psychology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. sugimotoyui761@gmail.com.
James R AndersonGraduate School of Letters, Department of Psychology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hika KuroshimaGraduate School of Letters, Department of Psychology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London 23H00494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In reverse-reward contingency tasks, the subject chooses between two potential rewards differing in value. To receive the higher-value reward, the subject must reach toward the lower-value reward; any reach toward the higher-value reward results in receiving the lower-value reward. In studies on animals, the rewards are usually food items differing in quantity or quality. Sixteen years after participating in reverse-reward tests, captive adult capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) were retested under the same conditions. We asked whether there would be evidence of memory of previous learning, or aging-related effects on performance. As previously, monkeys first experienced a "quantity" condition and then switched to a "quality" condition, or vice-versa. The two best-performing monkeys 16 years earlier showed significantly poorer performance in the present study, indicating possible age-related decline in reverse-reward competence. By contrast, a monkey not yet fully adult 16 years earlier but now 23 years old learned the R-R contingency in the quality condition, which suggests that inhibitory control ability in this species can be expressed at least into their 20s. Other individuals' performances were similar to those of 16 years ago, some associated with side preferences. Assessments of age-related changes in inhibitory control need to consider task characteristics and behavioral biases. Combining longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches may be optimal for clarifying the development and later decline of cognitive abilities across the lifespan.

Indexed as

AgingRewardSapajus apellaAnimalsFemaleLearningMaleMemoryAgingLearningMemoryReverse-rewardSapajus apellaSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID41801619
PMCPMC13283201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.