ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026
Irrational People Have Rights Too : Moving Beyond Rationality in Decisional Capacity Assessment.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dominant method of assessment for decisional capacity, the "four abilities" model, relies heavily on the reasoning abilities of the patient. This paper argues that the rational thinking required of medical patients to preserve their autonomy is a legal anomaly that is highly inconsistent with other areas of law, including the rules related to high-stakes social and economic decisions. The model also denies autonomy to a subset of individuals who possess strongly held and longstanding preferences regarding their care but are unable to explain the bases for these preferences in a manner satisfactory to physicians. Following up on recent challenges to the "four abilities" model by Fogal and Schwan, among others, this paper argues for an alternative model that embraces a values-based approach when such values are known and a "consistent preferences" approach when they are not known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.