Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801610›Full record

Observational studyMolecular imaging and biology2026

Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) Evaluation with [

Egesta Lopci, Angelo Castello, Alberto Testori, Emanuele Voulaz, Daoud Rahal, Matteo Perrino, Alessandro Crepaldi, Giorgio Maria Ferraroli, Valentina Errico, Edoardo Bottoni and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Molecular imaging and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02519049 (Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of 11C-Methionine PET/CT Imaging in Patients Affected by Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02519049 completednot on this map

Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of 11C-Methionine PET/CT Imaging in Patients Affected by Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) and Candidate to Pleurodesis

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Clinico HumanitasRan2014 to 2018Enrolled30ConditionsMesothelioma, MalignantArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Egesta LopciNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, CAP , 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy. egesta.lopci@cancercenter.humanitas.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-1094
Angelo CastelloNuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Alberto TestoriDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Emanuele VoulazDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Daoud RahalDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Matteo PerrinoMedical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Alessandro CrepaldiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giorgio Maria FerraroliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Valentina ErricoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo BottoniDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Marcello RodariNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, CAP , 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo MuragliaNuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe MarulliDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Marco AlloisioDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Andrea ZucaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) poses an imaging challenge that requires special attention, especially in patients who have undergone talc pleurodesis. [ MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively enrolled 30 consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of MPM who were referred to our Institution from September 2014 to February 2016 for talc pleurodesis. The study was approved and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02519049). Patients underwent assessment at baseline and after pleurodesis with two consecutive scans: FDG PET (standard imaging) and MET PET (experimental imaging). Semi-quantitative parameters were defined for both scans and statistically compared to pathological findings from video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS), including SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis for FDG PET or metabolic tumor burden (TLG or MTB = MTV x SUVmean) for MET PET.

resultsTwenty patients (M:F = 18:2; median age, 72 years) with MPM (18 epithelioid, 2 non-epithelioid) completed all study investigations. All tumors showed increased uptake of both FDG and MET PET. After talc pleurodesis, FDG PET showed a significant increase in mean and median MTV (P = 0.0005 and 0.0003, respectively) and mean and median TLG (P = 0.0172 and 0.0028, respectively). In contrast, MET PET parameters showed significant increases in mean and median SUVmax (P = 0.0208 and 0.0209, respectively) and SUVmean (P = 0.0106 and 0.0109, respectively) compared to baseline. There was a significant negative correlation between SUVmax, MTV and MTB/TLG and the percentage change at the early assessment post-pleurodesis for both MET PET (rho = -0.645, P < 0.01; rho = -0.517, P = 0.013; rho = -0.528, P = 0.011, respectively) and FDG PET (rho = -0.808, P < 0.01; rho = -0.781, P < 0.01; rho = -0.888, P < 0.01, respectively). The percentage change in SUVmax was significantly greater in FDG PET than for MET PET (+ 19% vs + 16%, P = 0.03). Additionally, mean and median MTV were significantly higher on FDG PET than MET PET (mean + 1022.3 vs + 224.2, P = 0.01; median + 157.5 vs + 7.1, P = 0.02).

conclusionsThis study confirms the impact of talc pleurodesis on FDG PET, particularly for volumetric parameters (MTV and TLG). MET PET appears less influenced by post-pleurodesis inflammatory reaction than FDG PET, with changes mostly limited to SUVmax and SUVmean. Clinical Trial Number (NCT02519049) at the Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ ).

Indexed as

Carbon RadioisotopesLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMethioninePleural NeoplasmsPleurodesisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTalcAgedFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMesothelioma, MalignantMiddle Agedcarbon-11 methionineCarbon RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18MethionineTalcFDGInflammationMesotheliomaMethionineMPMPET/CTTalc pleurodesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.