Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801586›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic uterine transposition for fertility preservation in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy: a narrative review of surgical evolution, technical strategies, and emerging evidence.

M D'Indinosante, G Parisi, Matteo Bruno, C Innocenzi, M Pavone, I Peters, G Corrado, D Querleu, F Fanfani, A Fagotti and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M D'IndinosanteDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
G ParisiDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
Matteo BrunoDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy. matteo.bruno@guest.policlinicogemelli.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-4220
C InnocenziDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
M PavoneDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
I PetersDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
G CorradoDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
D QuerleuDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
F FanfaniDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
A FagottiDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.
N BizzarriDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Unità Operativa Complessa di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00136, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine transposition (UT) has emerged as a highly innovative fertility-preserving strategy for patients requiring pelvic radiotherapy. Unlike conventional approaches focused primarily on ovarian preservation, UT aims to protect both ovarian endocrine function and uterine integrity by temporarily relocating the uterus and adnexa outside the radiation field, followed by uterine repositioning after completion of oncologic treatment. While the feasibility of this procedure has been initially established through laparoscopic techniques, recent years have witnessed the introduction of robotic assistance, potentially offering advantages in surgical precision, visualization, and ergonomics during complex pelvic and upper abdominal dissection. This narrative review synthesizes the available evidence on robotic-assisted UT and contextualizes it within the previously published laparoscopic experience. The laparoscopic literature has defined patient selection criteria, operative principles, and early functional outcomes, demonstrating that UT can be safely integrated into multimodal oncologic treatment pathways. The emerging robotic experience, although limited to a small number of reported cases, confirms the technical feasibility of the procedure, with low perioperative outcomes and encouraging preservation of endocrine, reproductive and oncologic outcomes. Further evidence from prospective, multicenter experiences is required to define long-term outcomes and to clarify the role of robotic-assistance in this pioneering procedure.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationRobotic Surgical ProceduresUterusFemaleHumansLaparoscopyPelvisRadiotherapyFertility preservationMinimally invasive surgeryPelvic radiotherapyRobotic surgeryUterine transposition

Identifiers

PMID41801586
PMCPMC12971863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.