Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801583›Full record

SynthesisActa parasitologica2026

Molecular Epidemiology of Giardia Species in Different Hosts in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Oluwasola Olaiya Obebe, Christopher Ifunanya Chukwu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oluwasola Olaiya ObebeDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. olashol@yahoo.com.
Christopher Ifunanya ChukwuNuffield Department of Population, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGiardia duodenalis is a widespread flagellated protozoan parasite that infects the small intestines of many vertebrate hosts. The purpose of this study was to better understand the molecular epidemiology of G. duodenalis infections in Africa.

methodsThe PRISMA for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria were used and five academic databases were searched for literature on the molecular detection of giardiasis in humans and animals in Africa. The study used a random-effects model and heterogeneity to estimate the pooled prevalence across studies that met the inclusion criteria. Fifty articles were included in the final analysis from a total of 1,121 identified articles.

resultsThe overall pooled molecular prevalence of giardia was higher in humans at 32.2% (95% CI: 24.8; 40.5) and lower in animals at 14.1% (95% CI: 0.9; 21.7). These studies have also identified variations in the distribution of Giardia duodenalis assemblages with Morocco having the highest pooled prevalence of assemblages A in human giardiasis (81.8%), while Mozambique had the lowest (8.2%). Similarly, Mozambique has the highest pooled prevalence of assemblage B (90.4%), whereas South Africa has the lowest (1.7%). Assemblage E, which appears in cattle, sheep, and goats, was the most common, with Rwanda having the lowest pooled prevalence (10%) and the Central African Republic having the highest (95.3%).

conclusionThe high heterogeneity across all studies suggests these results should be used cautiously, however, the findings highlight the importance of ongoing research on G. duodenalis in humans and animals in order to inform public health policy and enhance management methods aimed at reducing zoonotic transmission.

Indexed as

GiardiaGiardia lambliaGiardiasisAfricaAnimalsCattleHumansMolecular EpidemiologyPrevalenceAfricaAnimalAssemblageGenotypeGiardiaHuman

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.