Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801571›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Prediction of gestational status nineteen days after artificial insemination using color ultrasonography and machine learning strategies in beef heifers.

Pablo Sebastián Reineri, Sergio Daniel Roldán Bernhard, Santiago Alberto Principi, Juan Florencio Aller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo Sebastián ReineriNational Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), EEA Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, La Abrita, Santiago del Estero, G4206XBK, Argentina. reineri.sebastian@inta.gob.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-3134
Sergio Daniel Roldán BernhardNational Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), EEA Santiago del Estero, Santiago del Estero, La Abrita, Santiago del Estero, G4206XBK, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-0515
Santiago Alberto PrincipiPrivate Activity, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-5747
Juan Florencio AllerNational Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), EEA Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Balcarce, 7620, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-891X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to develop a predictive model of gestational status nineteen days after artificial insemination, using color ultrasonography and machine learning strategies in beef heifers. One hundred heifers were included in the study and on day 0 of the experiment underwent fixed-time artificial insemination. In addition, live weight, body condition score, uterine diameter, estradiol and progesterone concentration were determined. On day nineteen, the presence and area of the corpus luteum, area of the cavity of the corpus luteum, estradiol and progesterone concentrations, and vascularized area of the corpus luteum and blood flow of the corpus luteum were determined. Pregnancy diagnosis was made on days 35. To identify the model predictive capacity, we implemented a machine learning strategy, specifically a Random Forest Classifier. Two models were evaluated, the complete and reduced models. Model performances were quantified with the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, error and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Complete model produced accuracy of 75.3%, sensitivity of 82.5%, specificity of 66.6%, precision of 75%, error of 24.6% and AUC of 0.97. Reduced Model produced accuracy of 78%, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 66.6%, precision 76%, error of 21.9% and AUC of 0.95. In conclusion, the developed models reasonably predicted gestational status. While these findings should be interpreted as a tool under development and require increased sample size and external validation to confirm these preliminary observations, they offer an initial perspective on the importance of using machine learning strategies that integrate reproductive biotechnology, precision livestock farming, and computational analysis applied to bovine fertility.

Indexed as

Insemination, ArtificialMachine LearningAnimalsCattleClassification AlgorithmsCorpus LuteumFemalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyProgesteroneRandom ForestUltrasonographyProgesteroneBeef heiferColor ultrasonographyCorpus luteumMachine-learningPregnancy, artificial insemination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.