ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Prediction of gestational status nineteen days after artificial insemination using color ultrasonography and machine learning strategies in beef heifers.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article aims to develop a predictive model of gestational status nineteen days after artificial insemination, using color ultrasonography and machine learning strategies in beef heifers. One hundred heifers were included in the study and on day 0 of the experiment underwent fixed-time artificial insemination. In addition, live weight, body condition score, uterine diameter, estradiol and progesterone concentration were determined. On day nineteen, the presence and area of the corpus luteum, area of the cavity of the corpus luteum, estradiol and progesterone concentrations, and vascularized area of the corpus luteum and blood flow of the corpus luteum were determined. Pregnancy diagnosis was made on days 35. To identify the model predictive capacity, we implemented a machine learning strategy, specifically a Random Forest Classifier. Two models were evaluated, the complete and reduced models. Model performances were quantified with the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, precision, error and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Complete model produced accuracy of 75.3%, sensitivity of 82.5%, specificity of 66.6%, precision of 75%, error of 24.6% and AUC of 0.97. Reduced Model produced accuracy of 78%, sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 66.6%, precision 76%, error of 21.9% and AUC of 0.95. In conclusion, the developed models reasonably predicted gestational status. While these findings should be interpreted as a tool under development and require increased sample size and external validation to confirm these preliminary observations, they offer an initial perspective on the importance of using machine learning strategies that integrate reproductive biotechnology, precision livestock farming, and computational analysis applied to bovine fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801571What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.