ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Risk-adjusted learning curve for robotic colorectal surgery in an educational setting: a single-center consecutive series.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning-curve assessments for robotic colorectal surgery can be biased by temporal changes in case-mix and by increasing trainee participation. We evaluated a risk-adjusted learning curve using residual-based cumulative sum (CUSUM). We retrospectively analyzed 270 consecutive robotic colorectal resections performed between July 2019 and December 2025 at a single center. Operative time was modeled using multivariable linear regression including age, body mass index, ASA class, clinical T/N/M category, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND), multivisceral resection, console switch, and trainee involvement. Risk-adjusted CUSUM was calculated as the cumulative residuals (observed minus predicted operative time), and change points in the CUSUM trajectory defined proficiency phases. Median operative time was 279 [238–334] min. Overall complications (Clavien–Dindo > 0) occurred in 49/270 (18.1%), major complications (CD ≥ III) in 20/270 (7.4%), anastomotic leak in 13/270 (4.8%), conversion in 1/270 (0.4%), and transfusion in 7/270 (2.6%). Risk-adjusted CUSUM identified a change point at case 72, defining two phases. In this consecutive series, risk-adjusted CUSUM identified a phase transition in operative efficiency while short-term outcomes remained acceptable in the context of increasing trainee participation. Risk-adjusted learning-curve assessment may support benchmarking and evaluation of training programs in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.