ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Artificial intelligence based approaches for prediction of antimicrobial resistance in ruminant host pathogens.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing global health concern is Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), especially in livestock such as ruminants, where overuse of antibiotics leads to resistance. Predicting AMR in these hosts accurately is crucial for enhancing treatment plans and reducing hazards to the public’s health. Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) based framework for predicting AMR in ruminant-associated bacterial pathogens is presented in this study. The sequences of 190 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis were collected from different international bioprojects based on how the strains responded to five widely used antibiotics—Methicillin, Penicillin, Ampicillin, Ciprofloxacin, and Gentamicin. Features like GC content, k-mer frequencies, and open reading frame (ORF) statistics were extracted from genomic sequence data of susceptible and resistant strains to train a number of DL and ML models. Further, a transformer-based architecture called DNABERT was fine-tuned on DNA sequences using 6-mer tokenization in order to capture contextual nucleotide patterns. Furthermore, a web-based application have been developed to make it easier for users to upload genomic sequences and receive real-time resistance/susceptibility forecasts. Compared to existing alignment-based and database-dependent AMR prediction methods, the proposed models DNABERT and XGBoost were found to be the best with the precision 86.7% and 84.8% respectively, while maintaining robustness to novel and unannotated genomic sequences. Thus paper presents a new and intuitive AMR prediction system for ruminant specific microorganisms, which is not bound to specific database methods, and achieves the detection of AMR through recognition of alignment-free inherent genomic sequence features and transformer-based sequence learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.