ReviewInternational journal of hematology2026
Current status and issues with CAR-T cell products in Japan: a regulatory perspective.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell products is accelerating worldwide. CAR-T cell therapy represents one of the most significant therapeutic advances, as it elicits remarkably effective and durable clinical responses. Approved CAR-T cell products target one of two antigens on B cells: CD19 or B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). In Japan, all CAR-T cell products are approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, B cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. Although CAR-T cell therapy is indisputably one of the most recommended therapies, it has faced scrutiny for its high cost and several unresolved issues. This article outlines issues with and important considerations for CAR-T cell products reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. We describe the approval process for CAR-T cell products; differences in indications for their use, including optimal clinical use guidelines; and manufacture of CAR-T cells, especially out-of-specification products. We also describe key considerations in the regulatory review of CAR-T cell products, with a focus on clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.