ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Melanoma brain metastases outcomes following nivolumab and relatlimab after ipilimumab and nivolumab progression.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Relatlimab (rela) with nivolumab (nivo) has demonstrated durable responses in pre-treated advanced melanoma. Intracranial responses have been demonstrated with the combination of ipilimumab (ipi) with nivo in melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We sought to characterize intracranial outcomes in patients treated with nivo/rela following ipi/nivo. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who received nivo/rela with MBM was performed. Patients had prior ipi/nivo and active MBM. The primary endpoint was central nervous system progression free survival (CNS-PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), extracranial-PFS, and safety with local therapy. Results: We identified 24 patients, with a median follow-up of 14.2-months. Median age was 72 (range 31–85), 75% were male, and 29% had neurologic symptoms. The median total prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range: 1–8), and in the metastatic setting 2 (range: 1–8). Eighteen (75%) patients received local therapy with nivo/rela, 16 (67%) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 2 (8%) whole brain radiation therapy, and 3 (13%) surgery. Median CNS-PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI 2.5–24.2) and median extracranial-PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.9–15.7). Median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI 5.3–24.2), with a 12-month rate of 55%. No patients developed symptomatic radiation necrosis following SRS. Conclusion: Nivo/rela demonstrates moderate efficacy for MBM after ipi/nivo. Concurrent local therapy appears safe alongside nivo/rela.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.