ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Comparison of autopsy and stereomicroscope findings in the examination of hyoid bone fractures.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Laryngeal fractures represent important findings in asphyxial deaths due to hanging and strangulation. Forensic anthropological examination of bone following removal of surrounding soft tissues may provide more reliable information regarding the presence and location of such lesions. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of stereomicroscopy in the dedection of the hyoid bone fractures. Methods: The study was based on the examination of cases in which the hyoid bone was dissected during autopsy and subsequently referred for bone analysis. Following entomological maceration to remove soft tissues, the specimens were examined in detail using a stereomicroscope. The stereomicroscopic findings obtained from 276 hyoid bones were then compared with the corresponding macroscopic autopsy findings. Results: Differences between stereomicroscopic and the autopsy findings in the number of detected fractures were observed in 21.0% of cases. In addition, discrepancies in fracture localization were identified in 3.6% of cases. Conclusion: Due to its anatomical position, fractures of the hyoid bone may not always be detected during autopsy. Forensic anthropological examination of the hyoid bone following autopsy may therefore serve as a valuable complementary approach in determining the cause of death, particularly in asphyxial deaths resulting from hanging and strangulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41801535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.