ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species-induced infections in dogs: a narrative review of five cases reported in Brazil (1990-2024).
Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine tuberculosis (TB) is rarely or sporadically reported, although it comprises a zoonotic issue. In Brazil, a lack of comprehensive studies has been described, and the disease is restricted to case reports. Considering this scenario, we retrospectively studied cases of canine Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) infections in Brazil over 35-year period (1990–2024), and only five cases were described. Four MTBC species were initially identified (two M. tuberculosis and two M. bovis isolates) via microbiological culture/phenotypic methods and confirmed by molecular techniques (PCR-PRA, spoligotyping, and/or MIRU-VNTR). Dogs with TB-related M. tuberculosis infections had a prolonged history of contact with TB-positive owners, ingestion of leftover food from family members, or owners’ habit of spitting on the floor of households, indicating probable spillover of M. tuberculosis from owners-to-dogs. Dogs with TB-related M. bovis infections had a history of contact with bovines or buffaloes, milk ingestion, or contact with carcasses in farm environments, representing a probable transmission route of M. bovis from bovines or buffaloes-to-dogs. Clinical signs were observed in three (60%) dogs, represented mainly by progressive weight loss (100%), sarcopenia/cachexia (100%), melena (100%), and dyspnea/respiratory distress (66%). No specific antimicrobial therapy was carried out. Among the five dogs enrolled, two (40%) died, and three were euthanized (60%). Our results contribute to the understanding of the etioepidemiological aspects of canine TB (with emphasis on the probable transmission routes of the pathogen from livestock or humans-to-dogs infections), clinical findings, the need for a combination of methods to confirm the diagnosis, and better knowledge of veterinarians regarding canine TB due to nonspecific clinical signs and zoonotic risks. Despite the rarity of cases, we emphasize the challenging diagnosis of canine mycobacterial infections, the need for legal requirement to notify Brazilian public health agencies of confirmed canine TB cases, in addition to multiprofessional approaches in a One Health perspective in households with dogs infected, and the adoption of control/preventive measures against mycobacterial infections in dogs due to the risk of transmission of the pathogen to humans and other animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.