Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41801460›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Reflexive attention can be driven by monocular cues without conscious access to eye of origin information.

Luis J Fuentes, Fernando Valle-Inclán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luis J FuentesDepartamento de Psicología Básica y Metodología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain. lfuentes@um.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-9976
Fernando Valle-InclánDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad de La Coruña, La Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined whether monocular cues can facilitate reflexive attention in the absence of conscious access to the origin of the cue. Across three experiments, participants viewed brief, task-irrelevant, non-predictive cues, followed by targets presented through a mirror stereoscope. The cue and target were delivered to the same eye (valid trials) or the opposite eye (invalid trials). In Experiment 3 only, the cue was presented binocularly in 25% of trials (the neutral condition). Participants could not reliably discriminate which eye received the stimuli and responded solely to target detection. Reaction times were reliably faster in valid trials than in invalid or neutral trials at a cue-target stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) of 100 ms. No cueing effects were observed at shorter or longer SOAs, and no evidence of inhibition of return emerged. These findings suggest that early attentional facilitation can be triggered by eye-specific signals, even when there is no conscious awareness of the cued eye. By demonstrating a temporally selective, eye-based facilitation effect, the present results extend previous work on unconscious attentional modulation. They also suggest that early sensory representations can bias reflexive attentional orienting independently of awareness.

Indexed as

AttentionConsciousnessCuesReflexVision, MonocularVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultDichoptic presentationEye-of-origin informationMonocular cueingReflexive attentionUnconscious attention

Identifiers

PMID41801460
PMCPMC12971873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.