ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Reflexive attention can be driven by monocular cues without conscious access to eye of origin information.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No need to invoke 'unconscious attention' to explain the perceptual advantage of targets presented to the same eye as a preceding cue.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined whether monocular cues can facilitate reflexive attention in the absence of conscious access to the origin of the cue. Across three experiments, participants viewed brief, task-irrelevant, non-predictive cues, followed by targets presented through a mirror stereoscope. The cue and target were delivered to the same eye (valid trials) or the opposite eye (invalid trials). In Experiment 3 only, the cue was presented binocularly in 25% of trials (the neutral condition). Participants could not reliably discriminate which eye received the stimuli and responded solely to target detection. Reaction times were reliably faster in valid trials than in invalid or neutral trials at a cue-target stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) of 100 ms. No cueing effects were observed at shorter or longer SOAs, and no evidence of inhibition of return emerged. These findings suggest that early attentional facilitation can be triggered by eye-specific signals, even when there is no conscious awareness of the cued eye. By demonstrating a temporally selective, eye-based facilitation effect, the present results extend previous work on unconscious attentional modulation. They also suggest that early sensory representations can bias reflexive attentional orienting independently of awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.